Gärtner Hans-Martin & Gyuris Beáta
Hungarian quotative inversion
It is shown that Hungarian quotative inversion (QI) does not impose exhaustive
interpretation on the reported clause, in contrast to the effect of focus
inversion on focus-moved constituents. Two analyses of QI are sketched. One
takes QI to involve movement of a quotative operator, OpQ, to Spec,F(oc)P (cf.
Collins & Branigan 1997; Suñer 2000) and derives non-exhaustivity from a
constraint on focus induced by narrative force. The other assimilates OpQ to a
verbal modifier (VM) in Spec,PredP of a neutral sentence (in the sense of
Kálmán 1985) and derives non-exhaustivity from the fact that focus is absent
from such sentences. It is further argued that the second analysis possesses
advantages over the first one in blocking long-distance movement of OpQ.
Collins, Chris & Phil Branigan (1997): Quotative Inversion. Natural Language and
Linguistic Theory 15, 141.
Kálmán, László (1985): Word Order in Neutral Sentences. In: Kenesei, István (ed.):
Approaches to Hungarian, Vol. 1. Szeged: JATE Press, 1323.
Suñer, Margarita (2000): The Syntax of Direct Quotes with Special Reference to
Spanish and English. In: Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 525578.